Accruals Anomaly
DATA VALIDATEDEarnings driven by accruals persist less than earnings backed by cash, but prices act as if investors weight both the same, so high-accrual firms later disappoint.
How this run differs from the source: Accruals are net income minus operating cash flow, not Sloan's balance-sheet accruals; long only, 30 names.
| THE STRATEGY | $SPXTR BUY & HOLD | |
|---|---|---|
| CAGR | 17.3% | 9.3% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.82 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown | -53.0% | -50.9% |
// GROWTH OF $1, LOG SCALE
Out-of-sample (from the split): CAGR 14.5% against 14.0% for the benchmark; Sharpe 0.89 in-sample, 0.72 out-of-sample.
After 25 bps of trading costs: 16.1% a year. EDGE OVER RANDOM
// DECADE BY DECADE
| ERA | STRATEGY | BENCHMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.7% | 20.9% |
| 2000s | 17.2% | -0.8% |
| 2010s | 15.5% | 14.0% |
| 2020s | 15.7% | 15.2% |
// YEAR BY YEAR, LOSING YEARS IN RED
Losing years: 2002 (-2.1%), 2008 (-38.7%), 2011 (-3.0%), 2014 (-3.3%), 2015 (-6.4%), 2018 (-5.7%), 2022 (-20.1%). Each cell: the strategy, then the benchmark below it. * a part year.
// THE IDEA, AS PUBLISHED
Sloan (1996), The Accounting Review · 1996
- Accruals = change in non-cash current assets - change in current liabilities (ex short-term debt and taxes payable) - depreciation, over average assets
- Rank annually into deciles, four months after fiscal year end
- Long lowest-accrual decile, short highest
A real computation on the QuantGPT warehouse, walk-forward. A study across the whole market includes only part of the companies that later delisted from 1998 (survivors only before); a study on your own list of tickers is not affected. Gross returns, no costs except where stated. Past performance is not a promise. Findings, not advice. COMPUTED 2026-11-09 21:38 ON THE QUANTGPT WAREHOUSE. COMPANIES THAT LATER DELISTED ARE ONLY PARTLY IN THIS UNIVERSE (A FIX IS IN PROGRESS), SO THE RESULT LEANS TOWARD SURVIVORS. FUNDAMENTALS BY FILING DATE. NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. PRIVACY