Inspired by Priest and Faber: Shareholder Yield
TRADE-OFFDividends plus net buybacks (and, in Priest's version, net debt paydown) measure cash returned to holders better than dividends alone.
How this run differs from the source: Dividends plus buybacks with no net debt paydown, on all liquid stocks rather than the S&P 500.
| THE STRATEGY | $SPXTR BUY & HOLD | |
|---|---|---|
| CAGR | 12.6% | 9.3% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown | -70.1% | -50.9% |
// GROWTH OF $1, LOG SCALE
Out-of-sample (from the split): CAGR 11.0% against 14.0% for the benchmark; Sharpe 0.68 in-sample, 0.57 out-of-sample.
After 25 bps of trading costs: 11.6% a year. WITHIN RANDOM
// DECADE BY DECADE
| ERA | STRATEGY | BENCHMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.6% | 20.9% |
| 2000s | 12.2% | -0.8% |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 14.0% |
| 2020s | 8.9% | 15.2% |
// YEAR BY YEAR, LOSING YEARS IN RED
Losing years: 2007 (-10.9%), 2008 (-42.5%), 2011 (-2.3%), 2015 (-4.1%), 2018 (-7.6%), 2022 (-13.7%). Each cell: the strategy, then the benchmark below it. * a part year.
// THE IDEA, AS PUBLISHED
Priest & McClelland, Free Cash Flow and Shareholder Yield (2007); Faber, Shareholder Yield (2013) · 2007
- Shareholder yield = (dividends + net buybacks + net debt reduction) / market cap
- Common variant drops debt paydown
- Buy the highest-yield names; rebalance periodically
A real computation on the QuantGPT warehouse, walk-forward. A study across the whole market includes only part of the companies that later delisted from 1998 (survivors only before); a study on your own list of tickers is not affected. Gross returns, no costs except where stated. Past performance is not a promise. Findings, not advice. COMPUTED 2026-11-09 22:46 ON THE QUANTGPT WAREHOUSE. COMPANIES THAT LATER DELISTED ARE ONLY PARTLY IN THIS UNIVERSE (A FIX IS IN PROGRESS), SO THE RESULT LEANS TOWARD SURVIVORS. FUNDAMENTALS BY FILING DATE. NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. PRIVACY