Inspired by Asness, Frazzini and Pedersen: Quality Minus Junk
DATA VALIDATEDSafe, profitable, growing firms trade at only modestly higher prices than junk, so long quality, short junk earned positive risk-adjusted returns.
How this run differs from the source: One profitability measure (ROE) and two growth filters; QMJ's safety and payout legs and its junk short are missing.
| THE STRATEGY | $SPXTR BUY & HOLD | |
|---|---|---|
| CAGR | 17.0% | 9.3% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.92 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown | -46.5% | -50.9% |
// GROWTH OF $1, LOG SCALE
Out-of-sample (from the split): CAGR 17.8% against 14.0% for the benchmark; Sharpe 0.90 in-sample, 0.94 out-of-sample.
After 25 bps of trading costs: 15.9% a year. EDGE OVER RANDOM
// DECADE BY DECADE
| ERA | STRATEGY | BENCHMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.0% | 20.9% |
| 2000s | 14.0% | -0.8% |
| 2010s | 14.4% | 14.0% |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 15.2% |
// YEAR BY YEAR, LOSING YEARS IN RED
Losing years: 2002 (-4.4%), 2008 (-33.7%), 2014 (-4.5%), 2018 (-8.2%), 2022 (-8.2%). Each cell: the strategy, then the benchmark below it. * a part year.
// THE IDEA, AS PUBLISHED
Asness, Frazzini & Pedersen (2019), Review of Accounting Studies · 2019
- Quality score: z-scored profitability, growth and safety (low beta, volatility, leverage, distress risk)
- Payout (low net issuance) is added in some versions
- Long high quality, short junk within size groups, value weighted, monthly
A real computation on the QuantGPT warehouse, walk-forward. A study across the whole market includes only part of the companies that later delisted from 1998 (survivors only before); a study on your own list of tickers is not affected. Gross returns, no costs except where stated. Past performance is not a promise. Findings, not advice. COMPUTED 2026-11-09 23:54 ON THE QUANTGPT WAREHOUSE. COMPANIES THAT LATER DELISTED ARE ONLY PARTLY IN THIS UNIVERSE (A FIX IS IN PROGRESS), SO THE RESULT LEANS TOWARD SURVIVORS. FUNDAMENTALS BY FILING DATE. NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. PRIVACY