Neff's Low-P/E + Yield Discipline
DATA VALIDATEDBuy solid growers at low P/Es with dividends; the 'total return / P/E' ratio finds them.
How this run differs from the source: An absolute P/E cap with an E/P rank; Neff's total return ratio (growth plus yield over P/E) is not used.
| THE STRATEGY | $SPXTR BUY & HOLD | |
|---|---|---|
| CAGR | 13.9% | 9.3% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown | -53.7% | -50.9% |
// GROWTH OF $1, LOG SCALE
Out-of-sample (from the split): CAGR 15.3% against 14.0% for the benchmark; Sharpe 0.76 in-sample, 0.77 out-of-sample.
After 25 bps of trading costs: 12.5% a year. WITHIN RANDOM
// DECADE BY DECADE
| ERA | STRATEGY | BENCHMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -5.2% | 20.9% |
| 2000s | 16.3% | -0.8% |
| 2010s | 12.6% | 14.0% |
| 2020s | 18.6% | 15.2% |
// YEAR BY YEAR, LOSING YEARS IN RED
Losing years: 1999 (-3.3%), 2007 (-5.8%), 2008 (-30.2%), 2011 (-1.9%), 2015 (-5.6%), 2018 (-10.4%), 2022 (-14.8%). Each cell: the strategy, then the benchmark below it. * a part year.
// THE IDEA, AS PUBLISHED
John Neff, 'John Neff on Investing' (1999) · 1999
- Low P/E, well below the market's; (EPS growth + dividend yield) / P/E well above the market's
- Earnings growth above 7%, wary of rates above about 20%
- Solid companies; sell when fundamentals fade or price reaches value
A real computation on the QuantGPT warehouse, walk-forward. A study across the whole market includes only part of the companies that later delisted from 1998 (survivors only before); a study on your own list of tickers is not affected. Gross returns, no costs except where stated. Past performance is not a promise. Findings, not advice. COMPUTED 2026-11-07 08:41 ON THE QUANTGPT WAREHOUSE. COMPANIES THAT LATER DELISTED ARE ONLY PARTLY IN THIS UNIVERSE (A FIX IS IN PROGRESS), SO THE RESULT LEANS TOWARD SURVIVORS. FUNDAMENTALS BY FILING DATE. NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. PRIVACY